Skip to content

For institutions and media

The state does not take over PZPN.
It funds what can be measured.

What each partner gains, what we ask for and how to assess the proposal without contacting the authors.

Citizens’ proposal for assessmentstage 1 of 5documentation 1.5.1status as of 9.11.2026Status details (PL)

It does not show real people, places or events. Vector illustration: Polska 2038 team · CC BY 4.0

TL;DR · 1 min read

In short

  1. Principle. The state does not take over PZPN. It funds what can be measured, and the federation keeps the autonomy required by FIFA and UEFA.
  2. What each partner gains. For each partner: one benefit and one concrete request.
  3. Assessment without contacting the authors. Six check questions and the PDF package, version 1.5.1, with all data, sources and assumptions.
  4. We are looking for criticism. We publish named statements, positive and critical, only with the author’s consent and affiliation.

This page was translated from Polish with the help of AI tools. The Polish version is the reference text; a review by a native speaker is still pending.

Full documentation in Polish: Open the Polish page

Partners

What each partner gains and what we ask

Benefit and request for each partner
PartnerWhat they gainWhat we ask
Ministry of Sport and Tourism (MSiT)A multi-year programme with payment for results and full control of spending. Priority for mass sport and children’s health.Assessment of the proposal and a decision whether, and in what form, to prepare a pilot in 2027.
Chancellery of the Prime Minister (KPRM)A multi-year reform with measurable goals, staged roll-out and public control of spending.Forwarding to the relevant institutions for assessment and considering consultation with MSiT and PZPN.
PZPN and regional associationsMoney for training reaches the regions. The federation keeps its sporting decisions and regains fans’ trust.Participation in the Programme Council and a draft statute change for the 2027 congress.
Clubs and EkstraklasaHigher transfer value of homegrown players, stable rewards and a transition period before new requirements.An opinion on the proposed 2028/29 licence criteria, sent directly to PZPN.
Local governmentsBetter use of Orlik pitches and co-funding of coaches from the state budget.An assessment of whether the municipality could contribute its own share if a public institution announced a pilot call.
MediaOpen data with sources and ready material for their own independent analysis.A critical check of the numbers and assumptions.

Self-assessment

Six check questions

The assessment does not require contacting the authors. The PDF package contains all data, sources and assumptions.

  • Do the numbers match the primary sources?
  • Is the coach cost (PLN 3,000) realistic in a given voivodeship?
  • Which scenario can be funded from existing money?
  • Can the pilot indicators be measured with PZPN and Ministry of Sport data?
  • Does any element require a change from PZPN that the state cannot order?
  • What should be removed, changed or added before a decision?